THE BOOK:

Dodie Smith is famous for the book One Hundred and One Dalmatians, later a Disney movie, but is also known as the most successful female playwright of her age. I Capture the Castle was first published in 1949 and has never been out of print sine then. NEVER been out of print! That is astounding to me. I picked it up during my birthday book haul because I had read that J.K. Rowling loved it. Dodie Smith wrote the script for a two-act play with ‘musical notes’ for a 1954 West End production. A 2003 film starring Romola Garai as Cassandra, Bill Nighy as her father, Rose Byrne as her sister and Henry Cavill as Stephen Colley was generally appreciated by the audience. Finally, in April 2017 a musical version was put up at the Watford Palace Theatre northwest of London to positive reviews.
The first line is often quoted as one of the most memorable novel openers, “I write this sitting in the kitchen sink.” The journal keeper is seventeen-year-old Cassandra Mortmain and she’s in the sink because she’s found that sitting in a place where you’ve never sat before can be inspiring. As evidence, she confides that she wrote her very best poem while sitting on the henhouse. Cassandra is a bookworm and her father was a one-hit wonder of an author who suffers from writer’s block, so the literary references abound. The family lives in a run-down castle that is part of the estate of nearby Scoatney Hall, whose owner has recently died. Village gossip has it that the heir is a wealthy American, Simon Cotton. Simon, his mother, and younger brother Neil become intrigued with the genteel but impoverished Mortmain family, and Rose, Cassandra’s beautiful older sister decides that she will wed Simon. From this point on, the book reads rather like Shakespeare, where no one seems to be in love with the right person. As it is told from a teenager’s perspective and in a more naive age, the 1930’s, it is an endearing coming of age story with a supremely loveable character. I wondered if Cassandra’s warning to her family would go unheeded as in the Greek myth, but it didn’t play out that way.
Speaking of book covers, the book I read had the top cover. I wish it had been the other one because it so succinctly captures the gist of the book, including whimsy. The green one lacks imagination, and that is kind of insulting to this most imaginative book.
THE BEAUTY:
While Rose is in London, Cassandra goes forward with their annual Midsummer’s Eve celebration without her. Everyone else had someplace else to be, so Cassandra was utterly alone in the castle, except for the dog and the cat, Heloise and Abelard (of course). Just as Cassandra was beginning the rituals, someone called out to her. It happened to be Simon Cotton, the object of Rose’s affections. Having spent the day at Scoatney with the estate agent, Simon decided to pay a call on Cassandra and her father at the castle. When he realizes that its Midsummer’s Eve, he asks to be a part of the rites, as Rose had told him about the fun she and Cassandra used to have with them. When they were done and waiting for the fire’s embers to die down, a carpet of mist had crept in and mounted so high down by the moat that only the castle towers rose above it. The last of the day’s light faded as the moon rose, casting a silver light upon the mist. Simon, totally charmed by the view, wondered if anyone could capture the atmosphere in paint, then decided that Debussy could have done it in music. When Cassandra claims not to know Debussy’s music, Simon insists on taking her to Scoatney for dinner and a listen to Clair de Lune on the record player. This is Jean Efflam Bavouzet’s interpretation from Youtube.
THE FOOD:
Cassandra and Rose are dispatched to London to collect their deceased Aunt Millicent’s clothes. They have been given money for the train and taxis, and lunch. Laden down with furs they hadn’t known about, when they couldn’t quickly find a taxi, Cassandra persuaded Rose to go get something to eat first. They found a white table-clothed restaurant on Oxford Street, (la dee dah) where they finished off their modest meal with a treacle pudding.
Microwave Treacle Sponge Pudding
yield: 4-5 servings
½ C self-rising flour*
½ C sugar
½ C butter
2 eggs
3 T treacle or jam, if you prefer
1 T hot water
English custard or fresh cream
Cream the butter and sugar together with an electric hand mixer, then beat in the eggs and flour.
Grease a medium (roughly 1½ pint) bowl, and pour in the treacle. Microwave the treacle on medium power for 30 seconds, or until the syrup has melted.
Add 1 tbsp of hot water to the flour/egg mixture and mix in.
Pour the flour/egg mixture into the bowl with the hot syrup, cover the top of the bowl with Saran wrap, and microwave on full power for 3 minutes, or until done.
Note: Microwave wattages vary; please watch your mixture carefully to make sure it does not overcook in the microwave. Also make sure your saran wrap is microwave safe. Not all plastic cling wraps are safe for microwave use.
Leave the pudding to cool for 5-10 minutes, and then turn out onto a serving plate.
Serve with English custard or fresh cream, and a few summer berries.
*I didn’t have self-rising flour, but a google search had me add about a teaspoon of baking powder to cake flour and it worked fine, although I’d like to see if it would rise higher with the right flour.
Emergency Custard:
If you don’t have any custard powder on hand, you can mix up a batch using cornstarch, an egg yolk, milk, and vanilla essence. Mix 1 cup milk with 2 tsp cornstarch and bring to a boil while stirring. Remove from heat and beat in egg yolk and 1 tsp vanilla essence. Return the mixture to the heat, and continue stirring until it boils.
This was not as successful. I added some confectioner’s sugar to sweeten it, and that improved the flavor, but it never set like a custard should. We still spooned it over the pudding for the flavor, if not the texture.
This Newbury Honor Book is the third book in my recent reading that deals with foster children/orphans, or underprotected young adults on the fringes of social services. (Preceded by
This has been on my list of books to read, although I’m not sure where the recommendation came from. What a heartbreaking story about Leon, a 9 year-old boy in foster care in Britain in the early 1980’s. Leon is a treasure of a kid. I liked him so much, I wanted to adopt him myself! There is a backdrop of racial tension between blacks and whites that finally erupts into riots in several cities, including London, and is an important part of the story. Leon loves his baby brother, and provided most of Jake’s care when he was an infant, because his mother, Carol, is frequently unable to take care of even herself. When Jake, a blonde, blue-eyed white child was adopted, Leon felt betrayed by all of the adults in his life who wouldn’t let him visit Jake. Leon’s foster carer, Maureen, is a wise and good woman, but also absent through most of the book due to a debilitating illness that kept her in the hospital for an extended period of time. Ultimately, however, this book is about the meaning of family- the one you make, not the one you were born with, necessarily. All it took here to make one, was to assemble multiple people who love each other and are committed to one another during the good times and the bad. Families don’t necessarily look like what I grew up with in the 1950’s, and that’s great. The story stayed with me long after finishing the book.
I waited a long time for this book, and wanted to love it because of a glowing review by a blogger I follow. I plodded, rather than flew, through the book. Still, there was much to love, and I find myself thinking about the characters long after finishing the book. Set in Victorian England, there are distinct Gothic overtones to the story, that enhance the setting: London and Colchester. In the city, Charles Ambrose, a wealthy aristocrat and friend of the main character, Cora, expresses compassion for the poor of Bethnal Green who were forced to live in sub-human conditions: ” Even animals in the zoo should have their cages cleaned,” he says nobly. Before you get all judgy, remember that this is the England of Charles Dickens, and disdain for the poor was based on the upper class belief that their squalor was due to a moral deficit, not economic circumstances that left them with few resources to compete for a chance at a better life. The other location, Colchester, is the oldest recorded town in England, having been referenced by Pliny the Elder in 77 BCE. Wow! The 500 year-old George Hotel, where the Ambroses stayed when they visited, has Roman cellars, and is still in operation. In spite of its history, when Cora left London for Colchester after her husband died, her friend, Katherine Ambrose chided her, “If you wanted the sea, you could have used our house in Kent: here it’s little but mud and marsh for miles and the sight of it would depress a clown.” I love these people.
I bought this one on a “used bookstore” weekend and finally got around to reading it when my library holds dried up. (I’m number 185 on 98 copies, so it’ll be awhile before I read 


Laura Schroff was a successful advertising executive for the start-up national newspaper, USA Today, in Manhattan when Maurice, an eleven year-old panhandler, approached her for money on 56th St. and Broadway one Sunday afternoon. Initially she ignored him, walking right past. But then, for some reason, unknown even to her, she turned around and offered to buy him lunch at McDonald’s. That encounter was the start of an unlikely friendship that lasted for more than thirty years and is still going strong. Maurice’s is a story of survival. His father was abusive at first, then mostly absent from Maurice’s life later. His mother was an addict who was never a caregiver, but someone who needed to be looked after herself. There were his sisters who were older and wrapped up in their own lives, and a string of uncles with colorful nicknames who were all physically present in Maurice’s life, but there was no one to provide for his basic needs. So Maurice spent most of his time on the streets, finding ways to feed himself. Laura and Maurice soon fell into a routine where they met every Monday. As they spent more time together, Laura tried not to interrogate Maurice too much about his home life, so she never really knew just how tenuous Maurice’s domestic situation was. For his part, Maurice was curious about what Laura did all day. When she explained her job to him, he was amazed that she did nearly the same thing every single work day. Not only did his mother not work, no one in his family had a conventional job. Growing up in an environment like that, there was so much that Maurice didn’t know that Laura took for granted. Take for example, the first time Maurice came to dinner at Laura’s tiny apartment she asked him to set the table. When she noticed his hesitation, she showed him where the knives, forks, spoons and napkins, etc. were placed on the table. Laura worried about crossing a line with Maurice. She wanted to be his friend, and to be there for him, but she also recognized that she was not his family, and most of all, she did not want to give him expectations about his future that were unattainable. So, while she dispensed wisdom about living life in the way that a teacher or parent might do, she also tried not to preach, and took her cues, instead, from Maurice.
This is the love story of two young people living in an unnamed oppressive, volatile, and unstable city. In spite of the various restrictions on their lives, the two are relatively light-hearted and hopeful, just as any other young couple falling in love might be. Nadia is estranged from her family, having chosen to live alone in a culture where unmarried young women just don’t do that, but Saeed is close to his parents. When his mother is randomly killed in her own yard by militant gunfire, Saeed brings Nadia to live at his father’s house. They become like father and daughter quickly in those dangerous and uncertain times. When war breaks out, Saeed and Nadia have to decide whether to stay, or try to find access to the “doors” that are rumored to provide access to unknown locations, possibly thousands of miles away in another country. There were so many uncertainties when the couple made the decision to leave: can the person they’ve paid be trusted; where will they end up and will it be safer than where they are; will they make it to the designated door location without being apprehended by the police or the militants or the army; what will happen to them during the actual passage through the door? So many questions. Losing his mother, and leaving his father changed Saeed. He began to pray more, laugh less and lost his playful optimism. The rest of the story is about their literal journey, through the doors to new locations, and the journey of their relationship as their love grows and changes.
This is the saga of a Korean family who over time, ended up in Japan where they faced serious prejudice and discrimination. The family’s story begins in Busan, Korea, with Hoonie, born with a cleft palate and a twisted foot; and his parents, an aging fisherman and his wife. When Japan annexed Korea in 1910, things became economically dire for many Koreans. Hoonie’s family fared better than most because they had taken in boarders to supplement their meager income. These were the unlikely circumstances that brought Hoonie a wife. Ordinarily, a family would not arrange a marriage with someone like Hoonie for fear of passing along his abnormalities to his offspring. But when the colonial authority’s land surveys cost a tenant farmer the lease on his farm, and there was nothing left for his four daughters, it became expedient to reduce the number of mouths to feed in the family. No one was more surprised to see the matchmaker at her door than Hoonie’s mother. The matchmaker had come with an offer of the youngest farmer’s daughter, Yangjin, who was reportedly well-mannered and obedient, and the easiest of the four to get rid of. Yangjin and Hoonie met on their wedding day, and their relationship grew into a loving one over the years. The one sour note was that Yangjin miscarried three times before finally giving birth to a daughter, a survivor named Sunja. We follow Sunja’s family forward into 1989.
The book begins with a prologue that introduces Leo at a family wedding in July. Fast forward to October of the same year where the Plumb siblings are gathering for a family meeting at their go-to lunch spot in the Grand Central Oyster Bar. Each one has chosen to brace themselves for the occasion somewhere on the periphery of the Oyster Bar. Melody is at the Grand Hyatt Hotel on 42nd Street, secure in the knowledge that she wouldn’t run into the others there, they having rejected her suggestion to meet there instead. Jack is having a hissy fit at the Campbell Apartment, a little known upscale bar in Grand Central, also secure in the knowledge that he won’t be seeing his siblings before the appointed hour. The Campbell is too expensive, too staid – with a dress code, even. Jack, convinced that the mint in his drink had not been properly muddled, was sending it back. Beatrice was happily ensconced at Murphy’s on 43rd St. where she was something of a regular, as her husband, Tuck, had been friends with Garrie, the owner, back in Ireland. The first two are real places, although the Campbell Bar, closed now, is set to open again in May 2017 after a change in management. The Grand Hyatt is alive and well on 42nd St. A Murphy’s, however, is on 2nd Ave. at 52nd St., and it is an Irish Pub, so even though the genre of bar matches, the geography in the book is suspect. While all this is going on with three siblings, Leo, the eldest, is in Central Park for a “meeting,” when he realizes he’ll have to scramble to get a cab so as not to be late for lunch. Opening the book in this way gives the reader a quick, anecdotal sense of who the characters are, and an intimation of how they relate to one another. I was hooked from the first: Manhattan as the backdrop for a dysfunctional family showdown among four distinctively different personalities. Gold!
My ugly shells with delcious oysters!